Academic publishing is a world of subscription paywalls, high publication fees, and exorbitant subscription and/or pay-per-article charges. Combined with peer review (which is basically an academically sanctioned form of hazing), this traditional model of academic publishing can significantly delay the dissemination of knowledge.

In a recent Wired Magazine article, Dr. Michael Eisen (who co-founded the open access publisher Public Library of Science) wrote that among many factors, subscription-only publishing “retards scientific progress.” In the article comments, several readers mentioned the high publication fees charged by many journals (even the open-access ones). One reader responded:

Two words: fee-waiver.  Look it up on the PLoS website.  No-one should be unable to publish in PLoS for financial reasons, whatever their situation.

I wrote a reply—but since my comment is still “awaiting approval” after six hours (so much for open publication), I decided to paraphrase it here:

As the saying goes, “There’s no such thing as a free lunch.” Economist Milton Friedman famously titled his book with the old adage in 1975—one year before he won the Nobel Prize. In economics, this saying refers to hidden/distributed costs for things that are apparently free. Likewise, in academic publishing, there’s no such thing as a free article. Even if author fees are waived, publishing still isn’t free—whether or not a journal is open access. In a panel discussion titled Who Pays for Open Access? hosted by the Columbia University Scholarly Communication Program, Dr. Mike Rossner (Executive Director of the Rockefeller University Press) estimated that publishing one peer-reviewed online scientific article costs the journal $10,000.

If academic publishing needs reform, it’s not as simple as making everything free access. In a recent editorial Open Access—Pass the Buck (which is ironically behind a paywall), Dr. Maria Leptin sums things up quite nicely:

The economics of open access are crucial, but they should not dominate how we think about scientific publishing. We must protect the core principles of scientific publishing no matter what the model: the critical, independent scrutiny of scientific claims and long-term archiving of validated research.

References:

• Taylor, Mike. “Academic publishers have become the enemies of science.” The Guardian [London] 16 January 2012.
• Schieber, Stuart. “Will open-access publication fees grow out of control?” The Occasional Pamphlet [weblog] 31 July 2010.
• Monblot, George. “Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist.” The Guardian [London] 29 August 2011.
• Peer Review. Nature Web Debate. Accessed 25 March 2012.
• Eisen, Michael. “How traditional publishing hurts scientific progress.” Wired [San Francisco] 21 March 2012.
• Friedman, Milton. There’s No Such Thing As a Free Lunch. LaSalle, Ill: Open Court, 1975.
• Columbia University Scholarly Communication Program. Who Pays for Open Access? Research Without Borders series [Panel discussion] 9 March 2010 [view video on Youtube]
• Leptin, Maria. Open access – pass the buck. Science. 2012 March 16; 335(6074): 1279.

In the March 2012 Atlantic Magazine, Kathleen McAuliffe explores the notion that Toxoplasma gondii, a microbe found in cat feces, is a mind-controlling parasite that may lead to anxiety, schizophrenia, and car accidents:

How Your Cat Is Making You Crazy By KATHLEEN MCAULIFFE

Jaroslav Flegr is no kook. And yet, for years, he suspected his mind had been taken over by parasites that had invaded his brain. So the prolific biologist took his science-fiction hunch into the lab. What he’s now discovering will startle you. Could tiny organisms carried by house cats be creeping into our brains, causing everything from car wrecks to schizophrenia? (continue reading…)

Concerned that my beloved Chairman Meow is making me crazy, I wrote a song to soothe my troubled thoughts:

A Parasite Built for Two
Sung to the tune of Daisy Bell (a.k.a Bicycle Built for Two) by Harry Dacre

There is a kitty within my house. Chairman! Chairman!
Sometimes he gives me a half-dead mouse. A present from Chairman Meow!
Whether he’s given me parasites, I cannot tell right now,
But I am willing to share my life with beautiful Chairman Meow!

Chairman, Chairman, give me your answer do.
Am I half crazy all because of you?
It won’t be a good diagnosis if I have toxoplasmosis,
But you’re so sweet, I’ll gladly sweep your cat hair and scoop your poo.

Hot off the presses! Frontiers in Ophthalmology, a departmental report that covers the achievements and advances of the Harvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology:

I had the honor of serving on the review committee of this report and as scientific editor of the Research & Discovery section (2.4MB PDF).

Here is an example of the reviews:

“It would be impossible to read Frontiers without achieving a sense of excitement and enthusiasm for the level of research and the educational programs underway. It was particularly gratifying to learn of the activity and achievements of so many faculty friends for whom I will always have the greatest respect and appreciation.” —George J. Rabstejnek, Chairman Emeritus, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary is the main teaching hospital for the Harvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, and recently joined forces with Schepens Eye Research Institute, where I conducted my PhD dissertation research.

For more information:
www.masseyeandear.org
www.schepens.harvard.edu

Chairman Meow was featured in G1 Globo.com, a major news site in Brazil!

Here is a screen shot:

Full article here.

According to this translation, this is the title and story lead:

Disease in American cat discovers and creates campaign for the cats on the web

Wendy Chao pussy inherited by chance, a friend of his neighbor.
Today cured, ‘cat philosopher’ is site that helps rescue abandoned.

Oh my. Well, there’s nothing like having an international news site writing about your pussy…

According to a Boston Globe investigation, restaurants and markets in eastern Massachusetts mislabel their fish nearly 50% of the time (suggested by DNA analysis of 183 fish samples). In other words, if you order some fancy and/or expensive fish, there’s a good chance it’s a cheap, inferior, or even unhealthful substitute.

At least the beloved C-Mart in Chinatown is honest when the fish is of poor quality:

(Spotted several years ago; as of this writing, C-Mart no longer sells fresh crap in the seafood section)